METRIC FLIGHTTHE ARLO / LUNAR PROGRAM
AI-generated concept of a compact lunar outpost with linked pressure modules, external solar arrays and radiators
THE ARLO · MOON STATION / 02

The right ground
changes everything.

The lunar south pole is a candidate region—not a selected site. Light, terrain, communications and access must be assessed together.

Explore the station ↗Read the design basis

AI-GENERATED CONCEPT ART · NO BUILT STATION CLAIMED

CHAPTER 02 / CHOOSE THE GROUND

Follow the light across time

Concept study · 23 October 2026
Four crew / 30 days is a reference mission. Site, transport, safety case, mass budget and hardware remain open.

Choose the ground: SUNLIGHT, HORIZON, TERRAIN, ACCESS; conceptual functional relationships
ARLO functional study 02 · conceptual relationships, not a construction drawing.

DESIGN NOTE 01

Follow the light across time

A bright ridge in one image is not a continuous power supply. At polar latitudes, low sunlight interacts with local relief, mast height and shadows cast by the station itself. Build a time-resolved horizon model from terrain data, evaluate multiple seasonal conditions, and identify the longest credible interruption. Our 72-hour outage calculator is a sensitivity example; it is not a measured blackout at an ARLO site.

DESIGN NOTE 02

Keep the landing problem separate

Landing zones need bearing strength, acceptable slopes, hazard clearance and a surface interaction model for the selected lander. Exhaust can mobilize regolith and threaten habitats, radiators and optics. The tour deliberately shows landing infrastructure outside the habitat cluster. It specifies no safe separation distance: that number must come from plume, ejecta and trajectory analysis, including future arrivals.

DESIGN NOTE 03

Water is an investigation, not a utility

Ice in some permanently shadowed terrain is scientifically and commercially interesting. Extraction requires prospecting, excavation, energy, processing and contamination control. The first ARLO crew carries its water and contingency supply from Earth. A future pilot could establish recoverable concentration, variability and production energy before resource extraction joins the survival chain.

DESIGN NOTE 04

The site-selection deliverable

Compare at least three candidate locations using a consistent matrix: illumination gaps, local slope, boulders, soil properties, line of sight to Earth or contracted relays, science value, traverse difficulty and landing hazards. Carry uncertainty with every score. Select only after orbital mapping is supported by in-situ observations and the power, communications and transport teams agree on one operating envelope.

Research behind this chapter

Sources checked 23 October 2026. ARLO-specific architecture and numbers are proposed assumptions. Public research references do not imply endorsement or partnership.

EDITION 15 · DESIGN STAGE

2 W mirror benchmark · no measured result · independent review and registration pending.

Current evidence and open actions ↗
EDITION 15 · DESIGN STAGE

2 W mirror benchmark · no measured result · independent review and registration pending.

Current evidence and open actions ↗
EDITION 15 · DESIGN STAGE

2 W mirror benchmark · no measured result · independent review and registration pending.

Current evidence and open actions ↗
EDITION 15 · DESIGN STAGE

2 W mirror benchmark · no measured result · independent review and registration pending.

Current evidence and open actions ↗
EDITION 15 · DESIGN STAGE

2 W mirror benchmark · no measured result · independent review and registration pending.

Current evidence and open actions ↗