Measurement & replication

Evaluation of measurement data — Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement

2008 · Metrology reference

Methods & definitions

What this work contributes

Defines a measurement-model approach to evaluating and reporting uncertainty.

Where the evidence stops

A calculated uncertainty is only as defensible as its model and input evidence.

Keep the conditions with the result

Conditions
Type A and Type B evaluations; covariance and combined uncertainty.
Design use
Keep signal prediction, readout noise and residual systematic effects distinct.
Review access
Official BIPM publication record inspected; method reference.
Publication
JCGM 100:2008
DOI
10.59161/JCGM100-2008E

Original source

Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. Evaluation of measurement data — Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. JCGM 100:2008 (2008).

DOI: 10.59161/JCGM100-2008E

How we use it

This record belongs to Measurement & replication. Its evidence label describes the cited work, not the maturity of a Metric Flight device. Follow the original methods, corrections and conditions before transferring a result to a different geometry or scale.

Editorial note reviewed 19 October 2026. AI assisted research discovery and synthesis. Citation metadata and claims were checked against primary publication or institutional records; full-text access varies. Read the source for the complete method.