Casimir forces

What does a boundary change?

Material boundaries change electromagnetic fluctuation interactions. Compare attraction, repulsion and measured geometry dependence without treating a force on one boundary as vehicle thrust.

THE DECISION

Which material, separation and geometry actually enter the force prediction?

1948
Theory & models

On the attraction between two perfectly conducting plates

Derives an attractive interaction for ideal parallel conducting plates from the change in electromagnetic zero-point energy. The ideal zero-temperature pressure scales as the inverse fourth power of separation.

↗
1997
Measured evidence

Demonstration of the Casimir Force in the 0.6 to 6 μm Range

Uses a torsion-pendulum apparatus to measure the interaction between conducting surfaces. The reported range extends into micrometers, correcting the claim that Casimir forces are measurable only at nanometer separations.

↗
2009
Measured evidence

Measured long-range repulsive Casimir–Lifshitz forces

Demonstrates repulsive interactions between a gold-coated sphere and silica separated by bromobenzene. Carefully selected material responses can change the sign of a fluctuation-mediated interaction.

↗
2018
Measured evidence

Measurement of the Casimir torque

Measures the alignment torque between an anisotropic solid crystal and a separated liquid crystal using the liquid crystal's twist. Material choice changes the sign and magnitude, and measured angular and separation dependences agree with calculations within reported uncertainties.

↗